Mass Shootings Might Be Beyond the Reach of the Law

Legislation is not enough to stem the tide of gun violence in the U.S.

Two hands hold up a sign reading “We Can End Gun Violence”. A small circular sticker on the sign reads “March For Our Lives”. Photo by Pax Ahimsa Gethen, CC BY-SA 4.0.

In the wake of yet another mass shooting in the U.S., Texas lawmakers voted today to advance a bill raising to 21 the minimum age for buying a semi-automatic weapon. Family members of the victims of last year’s elementary school massacre in Uvalde cheered and wept tears of joy.

With sincere respect to these families, even if this bill does become law, I really don’t think this legislation will result in a noticeable reduction of people killed in school shootings. I must emphasize that I do not agree in any way with the National Rifle Association’s stance that the solution to “bad guys” with guns is to arm more “good guys” with guns. As I have posted repeatedly, I am a pacifist, and I oppose any and all use of firearms.

Rather, I see our culture of gun glorification as the root cause that must be addressed if we’re to stem the tide of these mass shootings. Yet, I do recognize the good faith of those who push for more gun control legislation. So I did a bit of research¹ on the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history to illustrate my doubts about the effectiveness of raising the minimum age requirement.

• The 2007 Virginia Tech shooting, killing 33 people (including…